What is the right strategy for maintaining a soccer pitch? For reasons of expensive recovery operations or even total renewals long before the expected end of lifetime, saving money now by extending maintenance intervals or waiting until problems occur is, as first long term practical tests show, the wrong way to save on overall synthetic sports surfaces cost
Replay Maintenance claims that whilst the low maintenance requirements of synthetic sports surfaces have always been one of their strongest selling points, it has become clear that planned, proactive maintenance regimes are the best way to maximize return on investment and minimize life cycle cost. For example, a planned maintenance program on a typical sand-filled synthetic grass pitch could save €60,000 over a 16-year period compared to reactive maintenance (see also life cycle cost graph below).
Additionally, proof of regular maintenance can and will help you to satisfy Health & Safety and Insurance Requirements and may protect you against claims for damages.
For further information on services of Replay Maintenance please see www.replaymaintenance.co.uk



0 Responses to “Maintenance of Synthetic Sports Surfaces: reactive or proactive ?”